I agreed with that decision, and still do. Reyes’s confession, DNA match and claim that he acted alone required that the rape charges against the five be vacated. Semen was found on the inside of their clothing, corroborating those confessions. In their original confessions-later recanted-they admitted to grabbing her breasts and legs, and two of them admitted to climbing on top of her and simulating intercourse. The five were charged as accomplices, as persons “acting in concert” with each other and with the then-unknown man who raped the jogger, not as those who actually performed the act. He admitted being the man whose DNA had been left in the jogger’s body and on her clothing, but the two juries that heard those facts knew the main assailant in the rape had not been caught. Salaam took the stand at his trial, represented by a lawyer chosen and paid for by his mother, and testified that he had gone into the park carrying a 14-inch metal pipe-the same type of weapon that was used to bludgeon both a male schoolteacher and Ms. Although none of the others admitted joining in the rape of Trisha Meili, they admitted attacking male victims and a couple on a tandem bike, and each of them named some or all of the five as joining them. And then there are the statements of more than a dozen of the other kids who participated in the park rampage. There were blood stains and dirt on clothing of some of the five.
![father in law gay rape porn story father in law gay rape porn story](https://i0.wp.com/www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/sextortion1_0.jpg)
There is, for example, the African-American woman who testified at the trial-and again during the 2002 re-investigation-that when Korey Wise called her brother, he told her that he had held the jogger down and felt her breasts while others attacked her. DuVernay would have you believe the only evidence against the suspects was their allegedly forced confessions.
![father in law gay rape porn story father in law gay rape porn story](https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/styles/opengraph/public/media_2022/01/202201lgbt_afghanistan_cover_illustration_0.jpg)
This is all supported by sworn testimony. When I heard his mother say he was 15, I immediately halted his questioning. Salaam himself claimed to be 16 and even had a forged bus pass to “prove” it. Salaam’s mother arrived and told police her son was only 15-meaning they could not question him without a parent in the room-I tried to stop her, demanding to see a birth certificate. In fact, two detectives went to the door of the Salaam apartment on the night of the 20th because both had been named by other rioters as attackers in multiple assaults. In reality, I didn’t arrive until 8 p.m., 22 hours after the police investigation began, did not run the investigation, and never made any of the comments the screenwriter attributes to me.īeing arrested on the street. In the first episode, the film portrays me at the precinct station house before dawn on April 20, the day after the attacks, unethically engineering the police investigation and making racist remarks. If that had been true, surely they would have brought those issues up and prevailed in pretrial hearings on the voluntariness of their statements, as well as in their lawsuit against the city. “When They See Us” repeatedly portrays the suspects as being held without food, deprived of their parents’ company and advice, and not even allowed to use the bathroom. None of this is true.Ĭonsider the film’s most egregious falsehoods. DuVernay’s film attempts to portray me as an overzealous prosecutor and a bigot, the police as incompetent or worse, and the five suspects as innocent of all charges against them. I was one of the supervisors who oversaw the team that prosecuted the teenagers apprehended after that horrific night of violence. Instead she has written an utterly false narrative involving an evil mastermind (me) and the falsely accused (the five). In sworn testimony given in two trials and affirmed by two appellate courts, and in sworn depositions of more than 95 witnesses-including the five themselves. The facts of the original case are documented in a 117-page decision by New York State Supreme Court Justice
#FATHER IN LAW GAY RAPE PORN STORY FULL#
Miniseries “When They See Us,” a series so full of distortions and falsehoods as to be an outright fabrication. So it is with filmmaker Ava DuVernay in the
![father in law gay rape porn story father in law gay rape porn story](https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2014/01/03/01/v25647073.jpg)
Meili, and that the district attorney consequently vacated the charges against the five after they had served their sentences, has led some of these reporters and filmmakers to assume the prosecution had no basis on which to charge the five suspects in 1989. That a sociopath namedĬonfessed in 2002 to the rape of Ms. But each has missed the larger picture of that terrible night: a riot in the dark that resulted in the apprehension of more than 15 teenagers who set upon multiple victims. Reporters and filmmakers have explored this story countless times from numerous perspectives, almost always focusing on five attackers and one female jogger.